De-Westernizing public relations: A comparative analysis of culture and economics structure in China and Mexico

Cesar Garcia

Abstract


The main purpose of this article is to challenge the normative ideal of public relations, usually shaped by a Western perspective, highlighting there is a broad typology of non-Western PR models, which are the norm across the world. This article emphasizes how public relations principles of excellence are not only exceptionally met but also suggests that Western public relations can learn from the rest of the world about, for example, how personal relations can enrich the profession. Using a qualitative method, this paper compares two populated countries with large economies, China and Mexico. The main finding of the article is that there are important forces, such as patronage relationships and economic structures, which place limitations on the trend toward homogenization in how the public relations discipline is understood, as well as in the convenience and even need of looking for a set of universal public relations standards. 

 

 


Keywords


China, Mexico, public relations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Archer, L., & Fitch, K. L. (1994). Communication in Latin American multinational organizations. In R. L. Wiseman & R. Shurer (Eds.), Communicating in multinational organizations (pp. 75-93). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.

Barrington, L. (2012). Comparative Politics: Structures and Choices. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing.

Bradsher, K. (2012, November 9). China’s greap on economy will test new leaders. The New York Times. Retrieved on November 21, 2016 from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/world/asia/state-enterprises-pose-test-for-chinas-new-leaders.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Broadfoot, K.J. & Munshi, D. (2007). Diverse voices and alternative rationalities: Imagining forms of postcolonial organization communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 21 (2), pp. 249-267.

Caplow, T. (1982). Christmas gifts and kin networks. American sociological review, 47 (3), 383-392.

Cendrowski, S. (2015, July 22). China’s global 500 companies are bigger than ever – and mostly state-owned. Fortune Magazine. It can be retrieved at http://fortune.com/2015/07/22/china-global-500-government-owned/

Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Chan, A. (2006). The Chinese concepts of Guanxi, Mianzi, Renqing, and Bao: Their interrelationships and implications for international business. Paper presented at the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy conference. Brisbane, Queensland. Retrieved on March 17, 2016 from http://www.anzmac.org/conference_archive/2006/documents/Chan_Alvin.pdf

Chen, N., & Culbertson, H. M. (2009). Public relations in mainland China: An adolescent with growing pains. In S. Krishnamurthy, and D. Verčič, (Eds.), The global public relations handbook. Theory, research and practice, (pp. 175-197). New York: Routledge.

Choi, Y. & Cameron, G. T. (2005). Overcoming ethnocentrism: The role of identity in contingent practice of international public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17 (1), pp. 171-189. In R. Appelbaum, W. Felstiner & V. Gessner (Eds.), Rules and networks: The legal culture of global business transactions, (pp. 325-347). Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.

Chung, W., & Hamilton, G. (2001). Social logic as business logic: Guanxi, trustworthiness, and the embeddedness of Chinese business practices.

Curran, E. (2015, July 30). State companies: Back on China’s to-do list. Bloomberg. It can be retrieved on http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-30/china-s state-owned-companies-may-face-reform

Danner, C. (2015, August 2). Meet Carlos Slim Helú, the wealthiest man in Mexico. Business Insider. It can be retrieved on http://www.businessinsider.com/carlos-slim helu-is mexicos-wealthiest-man-2015-7

Daymon, C. and Hodges, C. (2009), “Researching the occupational culture of public relations in Mexico”, Public Relations Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, 429-433.

Eisenstadt, S. N., & Roniger. (1984). Patrons, clients and friends. Interpersonal relations] and the structure of trust in society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Expansión. (2015). Las 500 empresas más importantes de México. Expansión. It can be retrieved at http://expansion.mx/rankings/2016/03/29/las-500-empresas-mas-importantes-de-mexico-de-expansion-2015

Ferrari, M. A. (2009). Overview of public relations in South America, in S. Krishnamurthy, and D. Verčič (Eds.), The global public relations handbook. Theory, research and practice, (pp.704-726). New York: Routledge.

Foncerrada, L. (2009, October). La importancia del sector privado en México. Entorno, 254, pp. 26-27. Retrieved on April 12 from http://www.coparmex.org.mx/upload/bibVirtualDocs/8_entorno_octubre_09.pdf

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.

Fuse, L., Land. M., & Lambiase, J. (2010). Expanding the philosophical base for ethical public relations base. Cross-cultural case application of non-Western ethical philosophies. Western Journal of Communication, 74, 4, 436-455.

García, C. (2011). Sex scandals: A cross-cultural analysis of image repair strategies in the cases of Bill Clinton and Silvio Berlusconi. Public Relations Review, 37 (3), 292-296.

García, C. (2013). Clientelism, economic structure and public relations in Southern

Europe: An example of diversity in the Western world. Public Relations Journal, 7(2). It can be retrieved on http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/

García, C. (2014). Clientelism and guanxi: Southern European and Chinese public relations in comparative perspective. Public Relations Review, 40 (5), pp. 798-806.

García, C. (2015). PR, clientelism and economics: A comparison of Southern Europe and Latin America. Journal of Communication Management, 19 (2), 133-149.

Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American sociological review, 25 (2), 161-178.

Gregory, A., & Halff, G. (2013). Divided we stand: Defying hegemony in global public relations theory and practice? Public Relations Review, 39 (5), 417-425.

Grunig, J. E. (2010). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalization. PRism 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.prismjournal.org/fileadmin/Praxis/Files/globalPR/GRUNIG.pdf

Grunig, J. E., Grunig, L. A., Sriramesh, K., Yi-Hui, H., & Lyra, A. (1995). Models of public relations in an international setting. Journal of public relations research, 7 (3), 163-186.

Guillén, A. (1996). Balance de la privatización en México. Iztapalapa, 38, pp. 13-36.

Gupta, C., & Bartlett, J. L. (2007). Guanxi, astrology and symmetry: Asian business and its impact on public relations practice. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 8(1).

Hackley, C. A., & Dong, Q. (2001). American Public Relations Networking Encounters China’s Guanxi. Public Relations Quarterly, 46(2), 16-19.

Halff, J., & Gregory, A. (2014). Toward an historically informed Asian model of public relations. Public Relations Review, 40 (3), 397-407.

Hallin, D., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, culture & Society, 24 (2), 175-195.

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heritage Foundation. (2015). 2015 Index of Economic Freedom. Ranking the Countries. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking

Hodges, C., & Daymon, C. (2008). ‘Insiders’ in Mexico: Researching the occupational culture of public relations. Paper presented to the Radical Roundatable conference, University of Stirling.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

Hou, Z., & Zhu, Y. (2012). An institutional perspective of public relations practices in the Chinese cultural contexts. Public Relations Review, 38, 916-925.

Huang, Y. (2000). The Personal Influence Model and Gao Guanxi in Taiwan Chinese Public Relations. Public Relations Review, 26(2), 219-236.

Hughes, S. (2008). The media in Mexico: From authoritarian institution to hybrid System. In J. Lugo-Ocando (Ed.), The media in Latin America, (pp. 131-150). London: McGraw-Hill.

Jones, V. (2004), “The rythms of Latin America: A context and guide for qualitative research”, in Marschan-Piekkari, R. and Welch, C. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business, Edward Elgar, Cheltentham, pp. 439-457.

Kawata, J. (2006). Comparing political corruption and clientelism. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Knight, A., & Pansters, W. (Eds.). (2005). Caciquismo in Twenty-Century Mexico. London, UK: Institute for the Study of Americas.

Lee, D., & Dawes, P. (2005). Guanxi, trust, and long-term orientation in Chinese business markets. Journal of International Marketing, 13 (2), 28-56.

Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. In P. Earley and M. Erez (eds.), New perspectives on international industrial and organizational psychology, (640-675). San Francisco, CA: Lexington.

Lindsley, S., & Braithwaite, C. (2006). U.S. Americans and Mexicans working together: Five core concepts. In L. Samovar, R. Porter and E. McDaniel, Intercultural communication. A reader, (275-280). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Long, R. (2004). The other ‘New’ Mexico. In D. J. Tilson and E. Alozie (Eds.), Toward the common good. Perspectives in international public relations, (pp. 43-63). Boston, Massachussets: Allyn & Bacon.

Lovett, S., Simmons, L. C., & Kali, R. (1999). Guanxi versus the market: Ethics and efficiency. Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 231-247.

Lustig, M. & Koester, J. (2006). Intercultural competence. Interpersonal communication across cultures. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224-253.

Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (2013). Intercultural communication in contexts. New York: McGraw Hill.

McGregor, R. (2011, January/February). Five myths about the Chinese communist party. Foreign Policy. Retrieved on April 10, 2016 from http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/01/02/5_myths_about_the_chinese_communist_party

Middlebrook, K. (2009). Caciquismo and democracy: Mexico and beyond. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 28 (3), 411-427.

Montenegro, S. (2004), “Public relations in Latin America. A survey of professional practice of multinational firms”, in Tilson, D. J. and Alozie, E. (Eds.), Toward the common good. Perspectives in international public relations, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, Massachussets, pp. 102-126.

OECD (2012), Latin American economic outlook 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Ogawa, A. (2006). Anti-fraud politics in the European Union: Multi-level disjuncture of legitimacy and effectiveness. In J. Kawata (Ed.), Comparing political corruption and clientelism, (pp. 63-77). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Pan, P., & Xu, J. (2009). Online strategic communication: A cross-cultural analysis ofU.S. and Chinese corporate websites. Public Relations Review, 35 (3), 251-253.

Pritchard, C. (2006). Global politics, academic dispositions, and the tilting of organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 19 4), 638 644.

Protheroe, J., Rogers, A., Kennedy, A. P., MacDonald, W., & Lee, V. (2008). Promoting patient engagement with self-management support information: A qualitative meta synthesis of processes influencing uptake. Implementation Science, 3(44).

Rebeil, M. A., Montoya, A., & Hidalgo, J. A. (2009). The public relations industry in Mexico: From amateurship to the construction of a discipline. In S. Krishnamurthy and D. Verčič (Eds.), The global public relations handbook, Theory, research and practice, (676-703). New York: Routledge.

Roniger, L., & Gunes-Ayata, A. (1984). Democracy, clientelism and civil society. Boulder: CO: Lynne Rienner.

Servaes, J. (2014). Guanxi in intercultural communication and public relations. Public Relations Review, 2014 (on proof).

So, Y. L. & Walker, A. (2006). Explaining guanxi. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Sriramesh, K. (2010). Globalisation and public relations: An overview looking into the future. Prism, 6(2). Retrieved on January 4, 2012, from http://www.prismjournal.org/fileadmin/Praxis/Files/globalPR/SRIRAMESH.pdf

Sriramesh, K., & Enxi, L. (2004). Public relations practice and socio-economic actors: A case study of different organizational types in Shangai. Journal of Communication Studies, 3(4), 44-77.

Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (2009). The global public relations handbook. New York: Routledge.

Sriramesh, K., & Verčič, D. (2012). Culture and public relations. Links and implications. New York: Routledge.

Taylor, M. (2000). Cultural variance as a challenge to global public relations: A case study of Coca-Cola scare in Europe. Public Relations Review, 26 (3), 277-293.

Toledano, M., & Avidar, R. (2016). Public relations, ethics and social media: A cross national study of PR practitioners. Public Relations Review, 42 (1), 161-169.

The Hofstede Centre. (2016). Mexico. It can be retrieved on http://geert-hofstede.com/mexico.html

Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133-160.

United Nations. (2015). World population prospects. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. Retrieved on http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf

Verčič, D., Grunig, L. A., and Grunig, J. (1996). Global and specific principles of public relations: Evidence from Slovenia. In H. Culbertson and N. Chen (Eds.), International Public Relations: A comparative analysis, (pp. 31-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wakefield, R. (2013). Personal influence and pre-industrial United States: An early relationship model that needs resurgence in U.S. public relations. Public Relations Review, 39, 2, 131-138.

Wank, D. (1996). The Institutional Process of Market Clientelism: Guanxi and Private Business in a South China City. The China Quarterly, 147, 820-838.

Wank, D. (2002). Business-state Clientelism in China: Decline or Evolution? In T. Gold, D. Guthrie and D. Wank (Eds.), Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture and the Social Changing Nature of Guanxi. Challenges for the Next Generation, (pp. 507-526). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Yan, Y. (1996). The flow of gifts. Reciprocity and social networks in a Chinese village. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Yang, C. F. (1989). A conception of Chinese consumer behaviour. In C. F. Yang, S. C. Ho, H. M. Yau (Eds.), Hong Kong marketing management at the crossroads: A case analysis approach, (317-342). Hong Kong: The Commercial Press.

Yang, A., & Taylor, M. (2013). The relationship between the professionalization of public relations, societal social capital and democracy: Evidence from a cross-national study. Public Relations Review, 39 (4), 257-270.

Zaharna, R.S. (2001). An “in-awareness” approach to international public relations. Public Relations Review, 27, 135-148.

Zhang, A. (2010). Understanding Chinese public relations education: A critical and cultural perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Washington D. C., United States.

Zhang, A., Hongmei, S., & Jiang, H. (2009). Culture and Chinese public relations: A multi-method “inside out” approach. Public Relations Review, 35, 226-231.

Zhang, L., & Xia, W. (2014). Integrating small and medium-size enterprises into global trade flows: the case of China. In M. Jansen, M. Jallab and M. Smeets (Eds.), Connecting to global markets. Challenges and opportunities: case studies presented by WTO chair-holders, (pp. 41-53). Geneva, Switzerland: World Trade Organization Publications.

Zhao, Y. (2012). Understanding China’s media system in a world historical context. In D. Hallin, and P. Mancini (Eds.), Comparing media systems beyond the Western world, (pp. 143-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The University of Newcastle
ISSN - 1839-8227