Understanding the study-to-work transition of Australian university graduates from disadvantaged backgrounds: A scoping study

Main Article Content

Kelly Whitney
Gayl Purchase

Abstract

Higher education is in a state of transformation with increasing funding cuts leading to an even greater emphasis on ‘value for money’ and graduate outcomes. Despite a proliferation of literature about access to university for under-represented groups in Australia, there is less attention devoted to students’ experiences after graduation, and particularly the study-to-work transition of university graduates from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Qualitative work is rare and heavily localised. Quantitative work is more common and discusses broad trends but this type of data is limited in helping us to understand the student experience, including barriers and enablers. This paper reviews the literature surrounding graduate transitions, synthesises findings and common themes and provides insights for developing more informed approaches and improving the transitional experiences of graduating students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Ten Australian studies were identified, pointing to an over-reliance on national surveys informing perceptions of graduate labour market transitions and a policy focus on access and participation, not employment outcomes, for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Article Details

How to Cite
Whitney, K., & Purchase, G. (2018). Understanding the study-to-work transition of Australian university graduates from disadvantaged backgrounds: A scoping study. Access: Critical Explorations of Equity in Higher Education, 5(1), 80–91. Retrieved from https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/ceehe/index.php/iswp/article/view/95
Section
Research Paper

References

Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1): 19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). 6227.0 Education and Work, Australia, May 2017,

Australian Government. (2017). 2016 First Half Year student summary infographic. Canberra: Department of Education and Training. Retrieved 6 March 2018 from

https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/2016firsthalfyearinfograpgic.pdf

Belley, P., & Lochner, L. (2007). The changing role of family income and ability in determining educational achievement. Journal of Human Capital, 1(1): 37-89.

Bennett, A., Naylor, R., Mellor, K., Brett, M., Gore, J., Harvey, A., James, R., Munn, B., Smith, S., & Whitty, G. (2015). Equity Initiatives in Australian Higher Education: A review of evidence of impact. Newcastle, NSW: Centre of Excellence for Equity in Higher Education, University of Newcastle. Retrieved from https://www.newcastle.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/261124/REPORT-FINAL.pdf

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J.G. Richardson (Ed.), The handbook of theory: Research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.

Coates, H., & Edwards, D. (2009). The 2008 Graduate Pathways Survey: Graduates’ Education and Employment Outcomes Five Years after Completion of a Bachelor Degree at an Australian University, Australian Council for Education Research (ACER).

Department of Education, Employment and Training (DEET). (1990). A fair chance for all: National and institutional planning for equity in higher education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

Edwards, D., & Coates, H. (2011). Monitoring the pathways and outcomes of people from disadvantaged backgrounds and graduate groups. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(2): 151–163. doi:10.1080/07294360.2010.512628

Harvey, A., Andrewartha, L., Edwards, D., Clarke, J., & Reyes, K. (2017). Student equity and employability in higher education. Report for the Australian Government Department of Education and Training. Melbourne: Centre for Higher Education Equity and Diversity Research (CHEEDR), La Trobe University.

Hsieh, HF., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15: 1277-1288.

Kennedy, S., Kenny, A., & O'Meara, P. (2015). Student paramedic experience of transition into the workforce: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 35: 1037-1043. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.04.015

Lee, J. (2014). The attainability of university degrees and their labour market benefits for young Australians. Higher Education, 68: 449-469. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9722-4

Li, I. W., (2014). Labour Market Performance of Indigenous University Graduates in Australia: An ORU Perspective. Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 17(2): 87-110. Retrieved from https://search-informit-com

Li, I. W., Mahuteau, S., Dockery, A. M., Junankar, P. N., & Mavromaras, K. (2016). Labour market outcomes of Australian university graduates from equity groups. Perth,

WA: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE) at Curtin University. Retrieved from https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/

/03/Labour-Market-Outcomes-of-Australian-University-Graduates-from-Equity-Groups.pdf

Levac D., Colquhoun H., & O'Brien K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69.

Martin, L. (1994). Equity and General Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

Mays, N., Roberts, E., & Popay, J. (2001). Synthesising research evidence. In N. Fulop, P. Allen, A. Clarke & N. Black (Eds.), Studying the organisation and delivery of health services: Research methods (pp. 188-219). London: Routledge.

Pitman, T. (2013). ‘Miraculous exceptions’: What can autobiography tell us about why some disadvantaged students succeed in higher education? Higher Education Research and Development, 32(1): 30-42. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.750278

Pitman, T., Roberts, L., Bennett, D., & Richardson, S. (2017). An Australian study of graduate outcomes for disadvantaged students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1349895

Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching (QILT). (2016). 2016 Graduate Outcomes National Report. Melbourne, Vic: Social Research Centre, Australian National University. Retrieved from https://www.qilt.edu.au/docs/default-source/gos-reports/2016/gos-national-report.pdf?sfvrsn=423de23c_12

Richardson, S., Bennett, D., & Roberts, L. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Equity and Graduate Outcomes in Australia. Perth, WA: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education at Curtin University. Retrieved from https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Investigating-the-Relationship-between-Equity-and-Graduate-Outcomesin-Australia.pdf.

Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2017). Statistics Report on TEQSA Registered Higher Education Providers – May 2017. Retrieved from https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net2046/f/statistics-report-teqsa-registered-higher-education-providers-2017.pdf?v=1507524756

Titus, M.A. (2006). Understanding college degree completion of students with low socioeconomic status: The influence of the institutional financial context. Research in Higher Education, 47(4): 371-398.

Western, J., McMillan, J., & Durrington, D. (1998). Differential Access to Higher Education: The Measurement of Socio-economic Status, Rurality and Isolation. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

Yosso, T. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of Community Cultural Wealth. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 81(1): 69-91.

Young, J. (2004). “Becoming Different”: Accessing University from a Low Socioeconomic Community-Barriers and Motivators. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17(5): 425-470. doi:10.1007/s11213-004-5788-8