The Poet’s Other Self: Studying Machine Writing through the Humanities


  • Cameron Edmond Macquarie University




As social discourse moves further and further into online spaces, the creation of fractured, fluid online identities increases. These online identities, known as “hyperidentities”, do not produce the traditional cultural artefacts of the non-digital past. Memoirs and novels are replaced by tweets and forum posts, seemingly incompatible with traditional forms of literary and media analysis. 

This article explores the use of “Machine Writing” – the creation of texts via computational methods – as a methodology for understanding online cultures. By using code to wrangle the textual artefacts created by online communities, such as tweets or forum posts, online identities can be unified into long-form pieces of prose or poetry that are ripe for analysis and critique. This article will introduce the concept of Machine Writing as a creative practice that intersects with the Digital Humanity’s “Distant Reading” methodology, through a transformation of Edgar Allan Poe’s The Raven using the Machine Writing technique Mathews’ Algorithm. The article will then interrogate the concept of hyperidentities by analysing three Machine Written texts born from them: Ranjit Bhatnagar’s I got an alligator for a pet! and You Can’t Write If You Can’t Relate, and Studio Moniker’s All The Minutes.


Bhatnagar, R 2013, I got an alligator for a pet!, viewed 1 April 2017, <>

Bhatnagar, R 2014, You Can’t Write If You Can’t Relate, viewed 16 October 2016, <>

Bhatnagar, R 2016a, Pentametron, Twitter, viewed 15 October 2016, <>

Bhatnagar, R 2016b, Pentametron, viewed 15 October 2016, <>

Chamberlin, W 1984, The Policeman’s Beard Is Half Constructed, Warner Books, New York.

Christie, A 2014, ‘Algorithmic Reading Before the Computer: An Experimental Environment for Modern Manuscripts’ Proceedings of Experimental Interfaces for Reading 2.0, IIT Institute of Design, Chicago, viewed 23 October 2016 <>

Filiciak, M 2003, ‘Hyperidentities: Postmodern Identity Patterns in Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games’, in MJP Wolf & Be Perron (eds.), The Video Game Theory Reader, Routledge, New York & London, pp. 87-102.

Fullwood, M 2014, Twide & Twejudice, viewed 7 April 2017,

Funkhouser, CT 2007, Prehistoric Digital Poetry: An Archaeology of Forms, 1959-1995, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Haraway, D 2016, ‘A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, technology and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century’, Manifestly Haraway, pp. 3-90. University of Minnesota Press.

Harmon, S 2015, ‘FIGURE8: A Novel System for Generating and Evaluating Figurative Language’ Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity, Association for Computational Creativity, Utah, viewed 13 October 2016 <>

Internet Stats 2017, Twitter Usage Stats (No date), Internet Live Stats, viewed 14 April 2017, <>

Kazemi, D 2013, NaNoGenMo 2013, GitHub, viewed 5 February 2017, <>

Kazemi, D 2014, NaNoGenMo 2014, GitHub, viewed 16 October 2016, <>

Kazemi, D 2015, NaNoGenMo 2015, GitHub, viewed 16 October 2016, <>

Kazemi, D 2016, NaNoGenMo 2016, GitHub, viewed 5 February 2017, <>

Kurt, J 2015, ‘The beginning of Oulipo? An attempt to rediscover a movement’, in Textual Practice vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 885-903, viewed 14 April 2017, DOI 10.1080/0950236X.2014.987692.

Ludovico, A 2016, ‘Machine writing: From meta-knowledge to artificial intelligence’ 4 May, Eurozine, viewed 10 October 2016, <>

Mac Low, J 1986, Representative Works: 1938-1985, Roof Books, New York.

Mathews, H 1998, ‘Mathews’ Algorithm’ in Motte, WF (ed.) Oulipo: A Primer for Potential Literature, Daily Archive Press, Illinois.

McGann, J 2014, A New Republic of Letters: Memory and Scholarship in the Age of Digital Reproduction, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Moretti, F 2013, Distant Reading Verso, London.

Motte, WF (ed.) 1998, Oulipo: A Primer for Potential Literature Daily Archive Press, Illinois.

Olewitz, C 2016, ‘A Japanese AI program just wrote a short novel, and it almost won a literary prize’, Digital Trends 23 March, viewed 18 October 2016, < >

Poe, EA 2010, ‘The Raven’ in Ackroyd, P (ed.) The Pit and The Pendulum, Penguin Random House, London.

Python Software Foundation 2001-2017, Python 3, [Programming language], available at

Rapatzikou, T 2010, ‘Chronology’ in Ackroyd, P (ed.) The Pit and The Pendulum, Penguin Random House, London.

Rodger, C 2013, ‘Reading the Drones: Working Towards a Critical Tradition of Interactive Poetry Generation’, Chercer le Texte conference proceedings, ELO Conference, viewed 20 October 2016, <>

Sharp, O 2016, Sunspring June 9, online video, viewed 25 October 2016, <>

Statistsa 2016, Number of monthly active Twitter users worldwide from 1st quarter 2010 to 4th quarter 2016 (in millions), viewed 14 April 2017 <>

Studio Puckey 2014, A diary of every minute of the day, viewed 16 October 2016, <>

Studio Moniker 2014a, All The Minutes, viewed 18 October 2016, Studio Moniker Email.

Studio Moniker 2014b, All The Minutes, Twitter, viewed 18 October 2016, <>

Studio Moniker 2014c, All The Minutes, viewed 18 October 2016,

Tranter, J 1997, Mr Rubenking’s ‘Breakdown’, viewed 26 July 2017,

Vinge, V 2016, ‘True Names’ in Frenkel, J (ed.), True Names and the opening of the cyberspace frontier, Penguin Random House, London.

Yang, G 2016, ‘Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case Of #BlackLivesMatter’, in Media and Communication vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 13-17, accessed 14 April 2017, Open Access Journal, DOI 10.17645/mac.v4i4.692.




How to Cite

Edmond, C. (2017). The Poet’s Other Self: Studying Machine Writing through the Humanities. Humanity. Retrieved from