Alternative approaches to the classic model of stage presence in performing arts: a review

Authors

Abstract

Stage presence in theatrical traditions is generally understood as the singular actor’s ability to enchant an audience, in what has been called the ‘classic model of presence’ (Sherman, 2016). According to such a model, presence is conceived as a prerogative of the skilled performer, resulting from intrinsic charisma and regimens of training. Whether stage presence is described as a kind of innate intensity or as skilful practice, the performer occupies a position of power, and audiences are conceived as merely receivers, without agency. Is presence an intrinsic aesthetic quality or rather is a state of mind that both audience and actors can share and experience? Some researchers have argued that the sense of stage presence emerges from interaction with the audience and the context, and that audience and performers constitute the performance event by their phenomenal co-presence (Zarrilli 2009, 2012; Fischer-Lichte, 2012), others claim equal responsibility for audience and performers in shaping the performance’s reception (Heim, 2016). Through critical analysis of the existing literature, this work proposes an ecological framework for the study of stage presence. By moving away from a classic model, it suggests possible methodological directions for a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon of stage presence.

Author Biography

Sarah Pini, Macquarie University

Sarah Pini is a PhD Candidate in Cognitive Science at Macquarie University (Sydney) working interdisciplinary on embodied cognition and dance. Her PhD thesis adopts an ethnographic approach to the study of the cognitive ecologies and the dimensions of variation in the enactment of ‘stage presence’ across distinct dance practices and performers. Sarah graduated M.A. in Cultural Anthropology at the University of Bologna, Italy, with a thesis in Medical Anthropology (2012) and B.A. in Visual Arts at the University Paris 1 – Pantheon-Sorbonne, France (2009), after she trained professionally in ballet and contemporary dance across Europe for several years, working and studying with international choreographers such as William Forsythe; Wayne McGregor; Angelin Preljocaj, Frédéric Flamand; Carolyn Carlson; among many others.

References

Barba, Eugenio, and Nicola Savarese. 2006. A Dictionary of Theatre Anthropology: The Secret Art of the Performer. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

Cuddy, Amy. 2012. “Your Body Language May Shape Who You Are.” TEDGlobal. https://www.ted.com/talks/amy_cuddy_your_body_language_shapes_who_you_are.

———. 2015. Presence: Bringing Your Boldest Self to Your Biggest Challenges. Little, Brown and Company.

Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2008. The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.

———. 2012. “Appearing as Embodied Mind – Defining a Weak, a Strong and a Radical Concept of Presence.” In Archaeologies of Presence: Art, Performance and the Persistence of Being, edited by Gabriella Giannachi, Nick Kaye, and Michael Shanks, 103–18. New York: Routledge.

Giannachi, Gabriella. 2012. “Environmental Presence.” In Archaeologies of Presence: Art, Performance and the Persistence of Being, edited by Gabriella Giannachi, Nick Kaye, and Michael Shanks, 50–64. New York: Routledge.

Goodall, Jane. 2008. Stage Presence. New York: Routledge.

Heim, Caroline. 2016. Audience as Performer: The Changing Role of Theatre Audiences in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.

Hutchins, Edwin. 2010. “Cognitive Ecology.” Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4): 705–15.

Jaeger, Suzanne M. 2006. “Embodiment and Presence: The Ontology of Presence Reconsidered.” In Staging Philosophy. Intersections of Theater, Performance, and Philosophy, edited by D Krasner and D. Z. Saltz, 122–41. University of Michigan Press.

McAllister-Viel, Tara. 2016. “The Role of ‘Presence’ in Training Actors’ Voices.” Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 7 (3). Routledge: 438–52.

Power, Cormac. 2008. Presence in Play: A Critique of Theories of Presence in the Theatre. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi B. V.

Riva, Giuseppe. 2008. “Enacting Interactivity: The Role of Presence.” In Enacting Intersubjectivity: A Cognitive and Social Perspective on the Study of Interactions, edited by G. Morganti, F., Carassa, A., Riva, 97–114. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Roach, Joseph. 2007. It. University of Michigan Press.

Sherman, Jon. 2016. A Strange Proximity: Stage Presence, Failure, and the Ethics of Attention. New York: Routledge.

Stanislavsky, Constantin. 1949. Building a Character. Edited by Translated by Elizabeth Reynolds Hapgood. New York: Theatre Arts Book.

Trenos, Helen. 2014. Creativity: The Actor in Performance. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Open.

Tribble, Evelyn. 2017. Early Modern Actors and Shakespeare’s Theatre: Thinking with the Body. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Tribble, Evelyn, and John Sutton. 2011. “Cognitive Ecology as a Framework for Shakespearean Studies.” Shakespearean Studies 39 (Annual): 94–103.

Zarrilli, Phillip B. 2009. Psychophysical Acting: An Intercultural Approach after Stanislavski. New York: Routledge.

———. 2012. “‘… Presence …’ as a Question and Emergent Possibility A Case Study from the Performer’s Perspective.” In Archaeologies of Presence: Art, Performance and the Persistence of Being, edited by Gabriella Giannachi, Nick Kaye, and Michael Shanks, 119–52. New York: Routledge.

Downloads

How to Cite

Pini, S. (2018). Alternative approaches to the classic model of stage presence in performing arts: a review. Humanity. Retrieved from https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/hass/index.php/humanity/article/view/64