Parrot, Parrotry and Truth in Flaubert’s Parrot
Abstract
In the studies on contemporary British writer Julian Barnes’s novel Flaubert’s Parrot, the early dominating postmodern trend is increasingly challenged by the explorations of the humanistic concerns. To continue this dialogue, this paper examines parrotry—a special kind of intertextual relationship Barnes engages in the novel so as to probe his views on the relationship between language, representation and truth. I argue that Barnes creates an “in-between” area between Flaubert’s modernist exploration of the possibility of language as a representation of truth and the poststructuralist conviction that language mediates all value constructions and constitutes their essence. The argument is developed by elaborating on the two dimensions of parrotry—the direct quotations of words, phrases or passages of Flaubert and other critics as well as the protagonist Geoffrey Braithwaite’s interpretation of his life in light of Flaubert and his works. In this analysis, Barnes’s resonance with Flaubert is revealed through the double connotation of parrotry: on one hand, it shows Barnes’s celebration of the evocative power of Flaubert’s words; on the other hand, it echoes Flaubert’s criticism of clichés and stupidity as a result of his sense of the inadequacy of words to express human feelings. By cross-examining the dynamic interaction between life and art, Barnes presents a more complicated picture of this relationship and the third dimension of truth: the experiential truth realized in the inter-illumination between art and life.This paper is based on a section of the author’s in-progress Ph.D. thesis and is financed by Yanshan University project “Truth in Between: Cross-Generic Writing of Julian Barnes” (No. 15SKA003).
The author would like to thank Yahua Wang (Beijing Language and Culture University) and Paul Sheehan (Macquarie University) for their valuable suggestions in the creation of this paper. Thanks also go to the two anonymous reviewers for their appreciation and kind advice.References
Bakhtin, M.M. The Dialogical Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist. Austin:University of Texas Press, 1981. Print.
Barnes, Julian. Flaubert’s Parrot. London:Picador, 1985. Print.
___. Talking It Over. London: Jonathan Cape, 1991. Print.
___. Something to Declare. London: Picador, 2002. Print.
Bedggood, Daniel. “(Re) Constituted Pasts: Postmodern Historicism in the Novels of Graham Swift and Julian Barnes.” The Contemporary British Novel. Ed. James Acheson & S. Ross. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005, 203-16. Print.
Bersani, Leo. Introduction. Madame Bovary. By Gustave Flaubert. Trans. Lowell Bair. Toronto & London: Bantam, 1972, ix-xxii. Print.
Block, H. M. “Theory of Language in Flaubert and Joyce.” Revue De Littérature Comparée 35.2 (1961): 197-206. Web.
Brooks, Neil. “Interred Textuality: The Good Soldier and Flaubert’s Parrot.” CRITIQUE: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 41.1 (1999): 45-51. Web.
Buck, Stratton. “For Emma Bovary.” The Sewanee Review 65.4 (1957): 551-64. Web.
Childs, Peter. Julian Barnes. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011. Print.
Cox, Emma. “The Hidden Narrator of Flaubert’s Parrot.” Critique 46.1 (2004): 53-62. Web.
Culler, Jonathan. Flaubert: The Use of Uncertainty. London: Elek Books Ltd, 1974. Print.
Dyer, Richard. Pastiche. New York: Routledge, 2006. Print.
Flaubert, Gustave. Madame Bovary. Trans. Lowell Bair. Toronto & London: Bantam, 1972. Print.
Fokkema, Aleid. “The Author: Postmodernism’s Stock Character.” The Author as Character: Representing Historical Writers in Western Literature. Ed. Paul Franssen & Ton Hoenselaars. London: Associated University Press, 1999, 39-51. Print.
Freiburg, Rudolf. “‘Novels Come out of Life, Not out of Theories’: An Interview with Julian Barnes.” Conversation with Julian Barnes. Ed. Vanessa Guignery & Ryan Roberts. Mississippi: University Press of Mississippi, 2009, 31-52. Print.
Genette, Gérard. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Trans. C. Newman & C. Doubinsky. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1997. Print.
Gitzen, Julian. “How to Be Postmodern: The Fiction of Julian Barnes and Alain de Botton.” Essays in Arts and Sciences 30 (2001): 45-61. Web.
Goode, Mike. “Knowing Seizures: Julian Barnes, Jean-Paul Sartre, and the Erotics of the Postmodern Condition.” Textual Practice 19.1 (2005): 149-71. Web.
Guignery, Vanessa. The Fiction of Julian Barnes: A Reader’s Guide to Essential Criticism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. Print.
___. “Julian Barnes in Conversation.” Conversations with Julian Barnes. Ed. Vanessa Guignery & Ryan Roberts. Mississippi: University Press of Mississippi, 2009, 101-14. Print.
Hateley, Erica. “Flaubert’s Parrot as Modernist Quest.” QWERTY, 11 (October 2001): 177–82. Web.
Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-century Art Forms. New York: Methuen, 1985. Print.
¬¬¬Jameson, Fredric. “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.” New Left Review 0.146 (1984): 53-92. Web.
Jenson, Deborah. “Bovarysm and Exoticism.” The Columbia History of Twentieth-Century French Thought. Ed. Lawrence D. Kritzman & Brian J. Reilly. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006, 167-70. Print.
Kristeva, Julia. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Leon S. Roudiez. Trans. Thomas Gora, Alice Jardine, and Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980. Print.
Moseley, Merritt. Understanding Julian Barnes. South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press, 1997. Print.
Nabokov, Vladimir Vladimirovich. Pale Fire: [a Novel]. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1962. Print.
Nicol, Bran. The Cambridge Introduction to Postmodern Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, Print.
Pătrascu, Ecaterina. “Flaubert’s Parrot and the Masks of Identity: Between Postmodernism and the ‘New Humanism.’” ACTA IASSYENSIA COMPARATIONIS, 9/2011 MĂŞTI / MASKS / MASQUES. Academia. Web.
Penteado, Bruno. “The Epistemology of the Parrot.” Nineteenth-Century French Studies 43.3 (2015): 144-57. Web.
Rose, Margaret A. “Post-modern Pastiche.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 31.1 (1991): 26-38. Web.
Sasto, Bruce. Language, History, and Metanarrative in the Fiction of Julian Barnes. New York: Peter Lang, 2001.Print.
Scott, James B. “Parrot as Paradigms: Infinite Deferral of Meaning in ‘Flaubert’s Parrot’.” A Review of International English Literature 21:3 (1990): 57-68. Web.
