Smashing the Patriarchy: the Political Possibilities in #MeToo and Feminist Political Theory

Authors

  • Lucy Nichols University of Newcastle

Keywords:

feminism, #MeToo, patriarchy, power, political theory, masculinist

Abstract

The subjugation of women by the state has transcended all periods of time and international boundaries. This subjugation can be linked to patriarchal notions of the state, through which the edifice of the state has been constructed to reflect masculine interests and norms. The notion of the patriarchal state is all the more pertinent today given the important questions and issues that have arisen out of the #MeToo movement. The movement is fundamentally concerned with the intersections of sex, power and justice within the state and seeks to expose the persuasiveness of masculine power within these domains. This paper analyses whether the modern state is irredeemably masculine, even misogynist by its very nature. It will do so by examining feminist political approaches to the state, before embarking on a case study of the indoctrinated patriarchal principles within structures including the workplace and the legal system. This essay will delve deeper into practices and norms of the patriarchal system that in fact normalises sexual harassment, and utilising connotations from the #MeToo movement to argue that the state is irredeemably masculinist.

References

Brown, W. (1992). Finding the Man in the State. Feminist Studies, 18(1), 7-34.

Chappell, L. (2000). Interacting with the State: Feminist Strategies and Political Opportunities. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 2(2), 244-275.

Codrea-Rado, A. (2017, October 16). #MeToo floods social media with stories of harassment and assault. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/16/technology/metoo-twitter-facebook.html

Connell, R. W. (1990). The State, Gender and Sexual Politics. Theory and Society, 19(5), 507-544.

Crabb, A. (2018, September 15). The #MeToo movement took the world by storm. Then it met French Resistance. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-04/metoo-took-the-world-by-storm-then-it-met-french-resistance/10195830

Eisenstein, Z. R. (1981). The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. New York: Longman.

Faith, K. (1994). Resistance Lessons from Foucault and Feminism. In H. L. Radtke & H.J. Stam (Eds.), Power/Gender: Social Relations in Theory and Practice. London: SAGE Publications.

Foucault, M. (1980). The History of Sexuality (Vol. 1), An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.

Franzway, S., Court, D., & Connell, R. (1989). Staking a claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy and the State. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

Gersen, J. S. (2018, March 30). Trump’s Affairs and the future of the nondisclosure agreement. The New Yorker. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/trumps-affairs-and-the-future-of-the-nondisclosure-agreement

Hester, M. (2017). Editorial. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(2), 141-146.

Hlavka, H. R. (2014). Normalizing Sexual Violence: Young Women Account for Harassment and Abuse. Gender & Society, 28(3), 337-358.

MacKinnon, C. (1979). Sexual Harassment of Working Women. New Haven: Yale University Press.

MacKinnon. C. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 8(4), 635-658.

MacKinnon C. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses of Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

MacKinnon, C. (1989). Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

MacKinnon, C. (2005). Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws. Boston: Harvard University Press.

MacKinnon. C. (2018, February 4). #MeToo has done what the law could not. The New York Times Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/04/opinion/metoo-law-legal-system.html

Messserschmidt, J. W. (1993). Masculinities and Crime: Critique and Reconceptualization of Theory. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Miliband, R. (1973). The State in Capitalist Society. London: Quartlet Books.

Millet, K. (1970). Sexual Politics. New York: Doublebay.

Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Redwood city: Stanford University Press.

Pateman, C. (1989). The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Zajicek, A. M. & Calasanti, T. M. (1998). Patriarchal Struggles and State Practices: A Feminist, Political-Economic View. Gender & Society, 12(5), 505-527.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-27

How to Cite

Nichols, L. (2019). Smashing the Patriarchy: the Political Possibilities in #MeToo and Feminist Political Theory. Newcastle Business School Student Journal, 2(1), 14–20. Retrieved from https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/uonsbj/index.php/uonsbj/article/view/52

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): Special Issue

Section

Contemporary Feminism

License

Copyright for all material published in the Newcastle Busness School Student Journal resides with the Author.

Readers ofthe Newcastle Business School Student Journal may, however, save and/or print any files from the Journal for their personal use, as long as no alterations are made to the material and any subsequent citation is properly acknowledged. For any other use/reproduction of material (e.g. for course materials), express prior permission must be obtained from the Journal's editorial board.

Authors are welcome to re-use/reprint their work elsewhere, as long as such publication includes due acknowledgement of the work's prior appearance in the Newcastle Business School Student Journal.

Authors are individually responsible for obtaining any necessary copyright permissions for images, photos or other materials reproduced in their articles and for including any required credits. Copyright clearance for their use must be lodged with the Journal if a submission is accepted for publication.