The Enlightenment of Man: the Patriarchal Nature of Western Liberalism

Authors

  • Nathan Allen Farrall

Keywords:

Feminist analysis, western philosophy, private public divide, social contract, sexual contract, state, discourse, masculinity, patriarchy, gender

Abstract

This essay explores the western liberal traditions that arose from the enlightenment, creating societies that are dominated by hegemonic masculinity. Both the idea of a ‘social contract’ and the public/private divide that are central to western liberalism are concepts that inherently advantage those who are best able to work within the masculine structures of the modern western liberal state. This hegemon continues to use the enlightenment principles of ‘rationality’ and ‘universalism’ that has forcefully legitimised liberal thinking and social structures to maintain a position of dominance while delegitimising counter-hegemonic movements. This essay argues that a fundamental rethinking of these philosophical traditions is needed if the masculine hegemon is to be successfully challenged. This rethinking of the modern state removed from its traditional masculine structures may allow for a radically rethinking of politics to one that makes room for care and more feminised practises.

References

Beasley, C, & Bacchi, C. (2010). Citizen Bodies: embodying citizens – a feminist analysis. International Journal of Feminist Politics, 2(3), 337-358.

Butler, J. (2011). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

Carver, T. (1998). Sexual Citizenship. In T. Carver & V. Mottier (Eds.), Politics of Sexuality: Identity, Gender, citizenship (pp. 13-24). London: Routledge.

Connell, R., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender and Society, 19(6): 829-859.

Frederick Engels (1902). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. Ernest Untermann, trans. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.

Garner, R., Ferdinand, P., & Lawson, S. (2016). Introduction to Politics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jaggar, A, M. (1983). Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Lawson, G. (2017). The rise of modern international order. In J. Baylis, S. Smiths & P. Owens (Eds.), The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (7th ed., pp. 37-51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Macgregor, S. (2014). Only Resist: Feminist Ecological Citizenship and the Post‐politics of Climate Change. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 29(3), 617-633.

Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Rhode, D. (1994). Feminism and the State. Harvard Law Review, 107(6),1181-1208.

Rojas, R. (2018, September 10). Women in Australia’s Parliament Denounce Sexism in Push for Change. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/10/world/australia/women-parliament-sexismbullying.html

Rückert, A. (2007). Producing Neoliberal Hegemony? A Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper in Nicaragua. Studies in Political Economy, 79(1), 91-118.

Schippers, M. (2007). Recovering the Feminine Other: Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender Hegemony’. Theory and Society, 36(1), 85-102.

Sinclair, A. (2014). A feminist case for leadership. In J. Damousi, K.

Rubenstein & M. Tomsic (Eds.), Diversity in Leadership: Australian women, past and present (pp. 17-36). Canberra: ANU Press.

Thompson, S. and Hoggett, P. (2012). The affective turn in contemporary political studies. In S. Thompson and P. Hoggett (Eds.), Politics and the Emotions. London: Continuum.

Walsh, B, M. (1995). Locke and Feminism on Private and Public Realms of Activities. The Review of Politics, 57(2), 251-277.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-27

How to Cite

Farrall, N. A. (2019). The Enlightenment of Man: the Patriarchal Nature of Western Liberalism. Newcastle Business School Student Journal, 2(1), 71–78. Retrieved from https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/uonsbj/index.php/uonsbj/article/view/56

Issue

Section

Feminist Political Theory