Lessons from Feminist Foremothers: The Imagining of the Post-Patriarch
Keywords:
Feminist theory, liberal feminism, radical feminism, post-patriarch, citizen, imaginative politicsAbstract
This article explores the imaginings of the post-patriarch through the lens of both liberal and radical feminism and the extent to which these differing strands of feminism can challenge the ontological masculine standard of the liberal citizen. From this discussion, central ideas from feminist theorists, including Germaine Greer and Catharine MacKinnon, conceptualise the patriarchal state, how oppression is embedded within the structure and the extent to which contemporary forms of resistance, such as the #MeToo movement, can challenge this understanding. This article ultimately concludes that the state as an apparatus of inequality is redeemably masculinist in the sense that when the root cause of inequality is addressed and overturned only then will women and men engage in reciprocal relationships. This indeed is the imagining of the post-patriarch.
References
Australian Human Rights Commission. (2018). Face the facts: Gender equality, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018_Face_the_Facts_Gender_Equality.pdf
Beasley, C., & Bacchi, C. (2000). Citizen bodies: Embodying citizens – A feminist analysis. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 2(3), 337-358.
Beechey, V. (1979). On patriarchy. Feminist Review, 3(1), 66-82.
Biggs, S. (2012). Liberalism, feminism, and group rights. The Monist, 95(1), 72-85.
Devine, M. (2018, September 16). Choose on merit not on gender quotas. The Sunday Telegraph, p.21.
Eisenstein, Z.R. (1981). The radical future of liberal feminism. New York: Longman.
Garner, R., Ferdinand, P., & Lawson, S. (2012). Introduction to Politics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gatens, M. (1991). Feminism and philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilbert, S.M. (2018). In the labyrinth of #MeToo. The American Scholar, 87(3), 14-25.
Goldman, E. (1969). Anarchism: What it really stands for. In R. Drinnon (Ed.), Anarchism and other essays. New York: Dover Press.
Greer, G. (1999). The Whole Woman. Sydney: Doubleday.
Hartmann, H. (1981). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a more progressive union. In C. McCann and S. Kim (Eds.), Feminist theory reader: Local and global perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 187-281). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis Group.
Hemmings, C. (2014). Sexual freedom and the promise of revolution: Emma Goldman’s passion, Feminist Review, 106(1), 43-59.
Jagger, A.M. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lister, R. (2003). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
MacKinnon, C. (1983). Marxism, method and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 8(4), 635-658.
MacKinnon, C. (1989). Towards a feminist theory of the state. London: Harvard University Press.
Marshall, B.L. and Witz, A. (Eds.). (2004). Engendering the social: Feminist encounters with sociological theory. New York: Open University Press.
Millett, K. (2016). Sexual Politics. New York: Colombia University Press.
Motta, C.S. (2017). Emancipation in Latin America: On the pedagogical turn. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 36(1), 5-20.
Nachescu, V. (2008). Radical feminism and the nation: History and space in the political imagination of second-wave feminism. Journal for the Study of Radicalism, 3(1), 29-54.
Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rogan, F. & Budgeon, S. (2018). The personal is political: Assessing feminist fundamentals in the digital age. Social Science, 7(8), 1-19.
Rottenberg, C. (2014). The rise of neoliberalism feminism. Cultural Studies, 28(3), 418-437.
Simon-Ingram, J. (1991). Expanding the Social Contract: Rousseau, gender, and the problem of judgment. Comparative Literature, 43(2), 134-149.
Spender, P. (2015). Gender quotas on boards – is it time for Australia to lean in? Deakin Law Review, 20(1), 95-121.
Summers, A. (2004). The end of equality. Sydney Papers, 16(1), 42-50.
Tong, R.P. (1998). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (2nd ed.). St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
Young, I. M. (2011). Five faces of Oppression. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zajieck, A.M. & Calasanti, T.M. (1998). Patriarchal struggles and state practices: A feminist, political-economic view. Gender and Society, 12(4), 505-527.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright for all material published in the Newcastle Busness School Student Journal resides with the Author.
Readers ofthe Newcastle Business School Student Journal may, however, save and/or print any files from the Journal for their personal use, as long as no alterations are made to the material and any subsequent citation is properly acknowledged. For any other use/reproduction of material (e.g. for course materials), express prior permission must be obtained from the Journal's editorial board.
Authors are welcome to re-use/reprint their work elsewhere, as long as such publication includes due acknowledgement of the work's prior appearance in the Newcastle Business School Student Journal.
Authors are individually responsible for obtaining any necessary copyright permissions for images, photos or other materials reproduced in their articles and for including any required credits. Copyright clearance for their use must be lodged with the Journal if a submission is accepted for publication.
