Are Multinational Enterprises’ Industrial Relations Strategies Shaped by Host Countries’ Laws and Trade Unions?
Keywords:
multinational enterprises, foreign direct investment, industrial relations, globalisation, international tradeAbstract
There has been considerable attention applied to the degree of operational strategy convergence of Multinational Enterprises (MNE’s) in the host countries within which they operate globally. This paper expands upon this concept with specific focus applied to industrial relations (IR) strategies and the extent to which these are shaped by the host countries’ laws and trade union influence. Specific attention is given to MNE’s originating from the United States of America, China and Australia to explore whether there are differences in attitude and approaches based on host country values. From this review it appears that the country from which the MNE originates does influence the methodology that is adopted. However, there is no definite doctrine that can be concluded from this discussion, there being a number of varying determinants which have seen many MNE’s adopt a hybrid model of IR strategy, influenced by both the home and host countries. The continued emergence and growth of outward foreign direct investment (FDI) from developing nations, coupled with evolving industrial relations systems throughout the world should continue to provide fertile ground for future researchers to examine the extent to which local laws and unions shape the industrial relations strategies of multinational enterprises.
References
Bartram, T., Boyle, B., Stanton, P., Burgess, J. & McDonnell, A. (2015). Multinational enterprises and industrial relations: A research agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Industrial Relations, 57(2), 127-145
Brandl, B., Strohmer, S. & Traxler, F. (2013). Foreign direct investment, labour relations and sector effects: US investment outflows to Europe. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(17), 3281-3304
Bray, M., Budd, J. & Macneil, J. (2015). The many meanings of cooperation in the employment relationship and their implications. Proceedings of the 17th ILERA World Congress. Cape Town, South Africa: Southern Sun, Cape Sun Hotel and Conference Centre
Cavusgil, S.T., Knight, G., Riesenberger, J., Rammal, H. & Rose, E. (2014). International Business: The New Realities (2nd Ed.). Frenchs Forrest, NSW: Pearson Australia.
Colvin, A. & Darbishire, O. (2013). Convergence in industrial relations institutions: The emerging Anglo-American model. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 66(5), 1047-1077.
Cullinane, N. & Dundon, T. (2014). Unitarism and employer resistance to trade unionism. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(18), 2573-2590
Ferner, A., Belanger, J., Tregaskis, O., Morley, M. & Quintanilla, J. (2013). U.S. multinationals and the control of subsidiary employment policies. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 66(3), 645-669
Ferner, A., Edwards, T., & Tempel, A. (2012). Power, institutions and the cross-national transfer of employment practices in multinationals. Human Relations, 65(2), 163-187
Fey, C., Nayak, A., Wu, C. & Zhou, A. (2016). Internationalization strategies of emerging market multinationals. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(2), 128-143
Geare, A., Edgar, F., & McAndrew, I. (2009). Workplace values and beliefs: an empirical study of ideology, high commitment management and unionisation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(5), 1146-1171.
Gould, A. M. (2010). The Americanisation of Australian workplaces. Labor History, 51(3), 363-388
Katz, H. & Colvin, A. (2016). Employment relations in the United States. In Bamber, G., Lansbury, R., Wailes, N. & Wright, C. (Eds). International & Comparative Employment Relations: National Regulations, Global Changes (103-125). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin
Lamare, J.R., Gunnigle, P., Marginson, P. & Murray. G. (2013). Union status and double-breasting at multinational companies in three liberal market economies. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 66(3), 696-723
Lawler, J., Chang, P., Hong, W., Chen, S., Wu, P. & Bae, J. (2013). Going abroad: HR policies, national IR systems, and union activity in foreign subsidiaries of U.S. multinationals. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 66(3), 1149-1172
Lévesque, C., Bensusán, G., Murray, G., Novick, M., Carrillo, J., & Gurrera, M.S. (2015). Labour relations policies in multinational companies: A three-country study of power dynamics. Journal of Industrial Relations, 57(2), 187-209.
Liu, M. (2010). Union organizing in China: Still a monolithic labor movement? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(1), 30-52
McDonnell, A., Boyle, B., Bartram, T., Stanton, P., & Burgess, J. (2015). Similarity or variation? Employee representation and consultation approaches amongst liberal market economy multinationals. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 70(4), 645-670.
Sablok, G., Bartram, T., Stanton, P., Burgess, J. & McDonnell, A. (2013). The impact of union presence and strategic human resources management on employee voice in multinational enterprises in Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(4), 621-639
Shen, J. (2007). Approaches to international industrial relations in Chinese multinational corporations. Management Revue, 18(4), 410-426.
Sheldon, P. & Thornthwaite, L. (2011). The state, labour and the writing of Australian labour history. Labour History, 100, 83-104.
Vo, A. & Rowley, C. (2010). The internationalization of industrial relations? Japanese and US multinational companies in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(1-2), 221-238
Zhu, J., Zhu, C. & De Cieri, H. (2014). Chinese MNCs’ preparation for host-country labor relations: An exploration of country-of-origin effect. Human Resource Management, 53(6), 947-965
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright for all material published in the Newcastle Busness School Student Journal resides with the Author.
Readers ofthe Newcastle Business School Student Journal may, however, save and/or print any files from the Journal for their personal use, as long as no alterations are made to the material and any subsequent citation is properly acknowledged. For any other use/reproduction of material (e.g. for course materials), express prior permission must be obtained from the Journal's editorial board.
Authors are welcome to re-use/reprint their work elsewhere, as long as such publication includes due acknowledgement of the work's prior appearance in the Newcastle Business School Student Journal.
Authors are individually responsible for obtaining any necessary copyright permissions for images, photos or other materials reproduced in their articles and for including any required credits. Copyright clearance for their use must be lodged with the Journal if a submission is accepted for publication.