Writing representations to life: higher education and the production of equity realities
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper deconstructs the often ‘taken-for-granted’ character of categories, classifications and representations that haunt higher education equity research and writing. It argues that there are no innocent representations. Instead, representations are part of the production of divisions: of how categories, classifications and groups are imagined. Far from an objectivist account of ‘the real’, the category used to represent is a performance of its own production. To speak or write the category is to bring the category into being, making possible particular forms of understanding, knowledge, action and practice.
This paper explores how these lead to forms of ‘representational violence’ in two forms. Firstly people are grouped into representations that are conducive to the ‘dominant imaginary’ (Lumb & Bunn 2021). In these, people are constructed by the most convenient forms for their control, measurement and regulation. Secondly, representations are produced through and between people in dominant positions, including policy-makers, researchers and institutional executives. This means that the very people being represented by a category rarely have the opportunity to be involved in the category’s construction. The paper thus concludes on the need to take the work of representation within equity writing seriously. Ignoring the need for radical deconstruction of categories as a part of equity writing, research and practice is very likely to lead to perpetuation of dominant representations that perpetuate cycles of inequality.
Article Details
References
Beck, U & Beck-Gernsheim, E 2002, Individualisation, Sage, London.
Bourdieu, P 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Bourdieu, P 1986, ‘The forms of capital’, in J Richardson (ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, Greenwood, Westport, CT, pp. 241–258.
Bourdieu, P 1987, ‘What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, vol. 32, pp. 1–17.
Bourdieu, P 1990, In other words: essays towards a reflexive sociology, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Bourdieu, P 1996, The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Bourdieu, P 2000, Pascalian Meditations, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Bourdieu, P 2018, Classification struggles: general sociology, Volume 1. Lectures at the College de France 1981–82, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Bourdieu, P 2020, Habitus and Field: general sociology, Volume 2. Lectures at the College de France 1982–83, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Bourdieu, P & Passeron, JC 1977, Reproduction in education, culture and society, Sage, London.
Bourdieu, P & Eagleton, T 1992, ‘Doxa and common life’, New left review, I/191, pp. 111–121.
Bourdieu, P & Wacquant, L 1992, Invitation to a Reflexive Sociology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Bunn, M & Lumb, M 2019, ‘Patient praxis: A dialogue between equity practice and research’, International Studies in Widening Participation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–9.
Bunn, M, Threadgold, S & Burke, PJ 2020, ‘Class in Australian Higher Education: The University as a Site of Social Reproduction?’, Journal of Sociology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 422–438.
Burke, PJ 2002, Accessing Education: effectively widening participation, Trentham Books, London.
Burke, PJ 2012, The Right to Higher Education: Beyond widening participation, London: Routledge.
Burke, PJ 2017, ‘Difference in higher education pedagogies: gender, emotion and shame’, Gender and education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 430–444.
Charlesworth, S 2000, A phenomenology of working class experience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gale, T & Parker, S 2017, ‘Retaining students in Australian higher education: cultural capital, field distinction’, European Educational Research Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 80–96.
Gordon, R, Lumb, M, Bunn, M & Burke PJ 2021, ‘Evaluation for equity: reclaiming evaluation by striving towards counter-hegemonic democratic practices’, Journal of educational administration and history, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2021.1931059
Hall, S 1997, ‘The work of representation’, in S Hall (ed.) Representation, Sage, London.
Lawler, S 2005, ‘Disgusted subjects: the making of middle-class identities’, The Sociological Review, vol. 53, no.3, pp. 429–446.
Lehmann, W 2013, ‘Habitus transformation and hidden injuries: successful working-class university students’, Sociology of Education, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 1–15.
Littler, J 2018, Against meritocracy: culture, power and myths of mobility, Routledge, New York.
Loveday, V 2015, ‘Working-class participation, middle-class aspiration? Value, upward mobility and symbolic indebtedness in higher education’, The Sociological Review, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 570–588.
Loveday, V 2016, ‘Embodying deficiency through “affective practice”: shame, relationality, and the lived experience of social class and gender in higher education’, Sociology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1140–1155.
Lumb, M & Bunn, M 2021, ‘The imaginer and the consequences of the dominant imaginary: forced perspectives, ontological limits and re/cognising the imaginer’s frame’, in R Brooks & S O’Shea (eds.), Reimagining the higher education student, Routledge/SRHE, London.
Pini, B & Previte, J 2013, ‘Bourdieu, the boom and cashed-up bogans’, Journal of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 2–3, pp. 256–271.
Reay, D 2017, Miseducation: Inequality, education and the working classes, Policy Press, Bristol.
Ringrose, J & Walkerdine, V 2008, ‘Regulating the abject, The TV make-over as site of neo-liberal reinvention toward bourgeois femininity’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 227–246.
Santos, B 2014, Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide, Routledge.
Skeggs, B 2004, Class, Self, Culture, Routledge, London.
Threadgold, S 2018, Youth, Class and Everyday Struggles, Routledge, New York.
Threadgold, S 2020, Bourdieu and Affect: towards a theory of affective affinities, Bristol University Press, Bristol.
Tyler, I 2013, Revolting subjects: social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain, Zed Books, London.
Wacquant, L 2013, ‘Symbolic power and group-making: on Pierre Bourdieu’s reframing of class’, Journal of Classical Sociology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 274–291.
Walkerdine, V 2019, ‘Neoliberalism’, in Y Stavrakakis, S Frosh, L Layton and D Nobus (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Psychoanalytic Political Theory, pp. 380–391.
Walkerdine, V 2021, ‘What’s class got to do with it?’, Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 60–74.