Reflections on evaluation of widening participation initiatives in England: The emergence and development of NERUPI
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
For this special issue of ‘ACCESS’ looking at the evaluation of equity and widening participation in higher education, my focus is developments in NERUPI (the Network for Evaluating and Researching University Participation Interventions). NERUPI set out to provide a collaborative space for colleagues involved in planning and evaluation of widening participation and equity (WP) initiatives. The NERUPI Framework (Hayton & Bengry-Howell 2016), which underpins the Network, is now 10 years old and was developed to address some of the dilemmas that were confronting evaluation of WP in higher education. This paper describes how a network such as NERUPI can combine understandings from educational theory along with insights from practice while continuing to take account of policy and reporting requirements. In this paper I outline the context for the creation of the Network and the NERUPI Framework, considering the impact of some recent changes in research, practice and policy on its development. Rather than exploring particular evaluation approaches and methods, I focus on how we aim to create a collaborative and reflexive environment for innovative evaluation. Policy changes described here relate mainly to England, where the majority of our members are based, and where WP activities of HEIs are regulated.
Article Details
References
Bourdieu, P 1986 ‘The forms of capital.’ In J.G. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U 1979 The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard. University Press.
Burke, P.J 2012 The Right to Higher Education: Beyond widening participation. Routledge.
Burke, P.J, Crozier, G & Misiaszek, L 2017 Changing Pedagogical Spaces in Higher Education. SRHE Higher Education Research book series. Routledge
Crawford, C, Dytham, S & Naylor, R 2017 The Evaluation of the Impact of Outreach: Standards of Evaluation Practice and Associated Guidance. The Office for Fair Access.
Daramy, F & Dumangane, Jr C 2025 ‘'Woke', intersectionality, critical race theory and decolonisation: misunderstood, misused and weaponised.’ Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 2025, 27(2) pp. 81–103. https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.27.2.81
Freire, P 1970 Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum
Gartland, C 2015 ‘Student ambassadors: ‘role models’, learning practices and identities.’ British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36 (8) pp. 1192–1211.
Gorard, S & Smith, E 2006 Review of widening participation research: addressing the barriers to participation in higher education. Report to HEFCE University of York, Higher Education Academy and Institute for Access Studies.
Hayton, A & Bengry-Howell, A 2016 ‘Theory, evaluation, and practice in widening participation: A framework approach to assessing impact’. London Review of Education, 14 (3) pp. 41–53.
Hayton, A & Stevenson, J 2018 ‘Key debates in researching and evaluating equity initiatives’ in P. J Burke, Hayton, A & Stevenson, J (Eds.) Evaluating Equity and Widening Participation in Higher Education. Trentham Books.
Hayton, A 2018 ‘Praxis Teams and Stakeholders’ NERUPI website resource. Accessible via: https://www.nerupi.co.uk/members/toolkit/basics/communities-of-praxis
Hayton, A 2024 ‘A historical context of widening participation and curriculum: A critical perspective.’ In Thomas, S. P & Quinlan, K. M. (Eds.) Culturally Sensitive Curricula Scales: Researching, evaluating and enhancing higher education curricula’ Palgrave Studies in Race, Inequality and Social Justice in Education.
Hayton, A & Moore, J 2024 ‘Developing a pilot peer evaluation system’ Quality Assurance Agency. Accessible via: https://www.qaa.ac.uk/membership/benefits-of-qaa-membership/collaborative-enhancement-projects/evaluation-and-evidence-based-decision-making/developing-a-pilot-peer-evaluation-system#
McCaig, C 2025 ‘The changing policy language of widening participation in the English HE market: from WP to ‘fair access’ and ‘social mobility.’ Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 27(2) pp. 8–32. https://doi.org/10.5456/
Miri, A. M 2024 ‘An integrated conceptual model for enhancing refugee education.’ British Education Research Journal, 50(4) pp. 1857–1877
Moore, J & Hayton, A (2025) Feasibility of enhancements to the Office for Students (OfS) Standards of Evaluation Evidence for Access and Participation Plans, NERUPI Website 2025
Office for Students 2023 Regulatory Notice 1: Access and Participation Plan Guidance higher education OfS 2023. 67. Accessible via: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/8921/regulatory-notice-1-access-and-participation-plan-guidance-dec-2023.pdf
Office for Students 2019 Access and participation standards of evidence. Accessible via: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/media/6971cf8f-985b-4c67-8ee2-4c99e53c4ea2/access-and-participation-standards-of-evidence.pdf
Office for Students 2018 A new approach to regulating access and participation in English higher education OfS. Website?
Whitty, G, Hayton, A &Tang, S 2015 ‘Who you know, what you know and knowing the ropes: a review of evidence about access to higher education institutions in England.’ Review of Education, 3(1) pp. 27–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3038.
Yosso, T.J 2012 ‘Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth.’ Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1) pp. 69–91.