‘Starting Strong’: A critical reflection of the complexities of orienting students in higher education

Main Article Content

Tanya Weiler

Abstract

Navigating any new environment can be stressful and confronting. For students in widening participation programs, orientation into the higher education environment can bring additional challenges potentially not considered nor adequately addressed by educators. This paper explores my own critical reflections as an academic in widening participation through the lens of my development and leadership of an orientation initiative – ‘Starting Strong’ – within an Australian enabling program. Through my involvement in the Centre for Excellence in Equity in Higher Education (CEEHE) Writing Program at the University of Newcastle, I was gifted time and a critical friend to explore my own perspectives and approaches to this initiative, underpinning this with theories of enabling pedagogy. Through this process I was emboldened to recognise that whilst the concept of commencing students being ‘on a journey’ is a well-worn metaphor, attention to the role of the educator on this journey must not go unexamined. As educators who commonly adopt the role of the ‘mentor’ within the ‘Hero’s Journey’ of our students (Campbell, 1949), we need time and space to interrogate the initiatives such as ‘Starting Strong’, to ensure that such interventions, designed to help students navigate and negotiate their new environment, do not unwittingly reproduce the structural inequalities inherent in higher education.

Article Details

How to Cite
Weiler, T. (2020). ‘Starting Strong’: A critical reflection of the complexities of orienting students in higher education. Access: Critical Explorations of Equity in Higher Education, 7(1), 59–73. Retrieved from https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/ceehe/index.php/iswp/article/view/147
Section
Research Paper

References

Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: culture and the terms of recognition. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action (pp. 59–84). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Archer, L. & Yamashita, H. (2003). ‘Knowing their limits?’ Identities, inequalities and inner city school leavers’ post-16 aspirations. Journal of Education Policy, 18(1), 53–69.

Baker, S., Ramsay, G., Irwin, W. & Miles, L. (2018). ‘Hot’, ‘Cold’ and ‘Warm’ supports: towards theorising where refugee students go for assistance at university. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(1), 1–16.

Ball, S. & Vincent, C. (1998). ‘I heard it on the Grapevine’: ‘Hot’ Knowledge and School Choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377–400.

Bunn, R. J. (2019). ‘We need to help students discover themselves and see into the life of things’: Advice from Open Foundations Lecturers. In A. Jones, A. Olds & J. G. Lisciandro (Eds.), Transitioning students into Higher Education, Philosophies, Pedagogies and Practice (pp. 2–11). Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.

Bennett, A. & Burke, P. J. (2017). Re/conceptualising time and temporality: an exploration of time in higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(6), 913–925.

Burke, P. J. (2012). The Right to Higher Education: Beyond Widening Participation. London: Routledge.

Burke, P. J., Bennett, A., Burgess, C., Gray, K. & Southgate, E. (2016). Capability, Belonging and Equity in Higher Education: Developing Inclusive Approaches. Newcastle, Australia: Centre of Excellence for Equity in Higher Education, University of Newcastle.

Burke, P. J., Crozier, G., & Misiaszek, L. I. (2017). Changing Pedagogical Spaces in Higher Education: Diversity, inequalities and misrecognition. London: Routledge.

Brunton, J., Brown, M., Costello, E. & Farrell O. (2019). Pre-induction supports for flexible learners: The Head Start Online MOOC pilot. A Practice Report. Student Success, 10(1), 155–161.

Cable, D., Gino, F. & Staats, B. R. (2013a). Breaking them in or Eliciting Their Best? Reframing Socialization around Newcomers’ Authentic Self-expression. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 1–36.

Cable, D., Gino, F. & Staats, B. R. (2013b). Reinventing Employee Onboarding. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3), 23–28.

Cairns, G. & Śliwa, M. (2008). The implications of Aristotle’s phronēsis for organizational inquiry. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), Handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 318–328). London: Sage.

Callender, C. (2006). Access to higher education in Britain: The impact of tuition fees and financial assistance. In P. N. Teixeira, D. B. Johnstone, M. J. Rosa & H. Vossensteyn (Eds.) Cost-sharing and accessibility in higher education: A fairer deal? (pp. 105–132). Netherlands: Springer.

Campbell, J. (1949). The Hero with a Thousand Faces (1st ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Croker, A. & Trede, F. (2009) Involving Critical Friends in Writing. In J. Higgs, D. Horsfall & S. Grace (Eds.) Writing Qualitative Research on Practice (pp. 231–242). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inequity fails and how it can succeed again, (S. Sampson, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grandey, A. A. (2003). When “The Show Must Go On”: Surface acting and deep acting determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. The Academy of Management, 46(1), 86–96.

Habel, C. & Whitman, K. (2016). Opening spaces of academic culture: doors of perception; heaven and hell. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 71–83.

Hattam, S. & Bilic, S. (2019). ‘I can be powerful as an individual agent’: Experiences of recently homeless women in an enabling program, transformative pedagogies and spaces of empowerment in higher education. International Studies in Widening Participation, 6(1), 65–79.

Hattam, R., Brennan, M., Zipin, L. & Comber, B. (2009). Researching for social justice: contextual, conceptual and methodological challenges. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 303–316.

Hattam, S., Stokes, J. & Ulpen, T. (2018). ‘Should I stay or should I go? Understanding student subjectivity, institutional discourse and the role enabling academics can play in empowering students within the system. International Journal of Educational Organisation and Leadership, 25(1–2), 1–14.

Hodges, B., Bedford, T., Hartley, J., Klinger, C., Murray, N., O’Rourke, J. & Schofield, N. (2013). Enabling Retention: Processes and Strategies for Improving Student Retention in University-Based Enabling Program. Canberra: Office for Learning and Teaching, Commonwealth of Australia.

Hutchings, M. (2006). Information, advice and cultural discourses of higher education. In L. Archer, M. Hutchings & A. Ross (Eds.), Higher education and social class: Issues of exclusion and inclusion (pp. 97–118). New York: Routledge Farmer.

King, S., Luzeckyj, A. & McCann, B. (2019). The experience of being first in family at university: Pioneers in higher education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0921-6

Larmar, S. & Ingamells, A. (2010). Enhancing the First-Year University Experience: linking university orientation and engagement strategies to student connectivity and capability. Research in Comparative and International education, 5(2), 210–223.

Martin, F., Steedman, M. & Keleher, P. (2006). The Importance of Induction and Orientation Activities for First Year Engineering Students. In Australasian Association for Engineering Education (Ed.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education: Creativity, Challenge, Change; Partnerships in Engineering Education (pp. 446–452). Australasian Association for Engineering Education.

Moondog. (2004). FacePalm in Urban Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.urbandictionary.com/author.php?author=Moondog

Munro, S., Brown, L., Croker, A., Fisher, K., Burrows, J. & Munro, L. (2019). Yearning to Yarn: Using Aboriginal ways of knowing and learning to support clinical placement experiences of Aboriginal health professional students. Report prepared for the Centre of Excellence for Equity in Higher Education’s Excellence in Teaching for Equity in Higher Education. ISBN [978-0-7259-0102-8]

O’Keefe, P. (2019). PhD by Publication: innovative approach to social science research, or operationalisation of the doctoral student…or both? Higher Education Research & Development, 39(2), 288–301. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1666258

Peat, M., Dalziel, J. & Grant, A. M, (2001). Enhancing the First Year Student Experience by Facilitating the Development of Peer Networks through a One-day Workshop. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(2), 199–215. DOI: 10.1080/07294360123888

Scanlon, L., Rowling, L., & Weber, Z. (2007). ‘You don't have like an identity … you are just lost in a crowd’: Forming a Student Identity in the First-year Transition to University. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(2). DOI: 10.1080/13676260600983684

Smith, L. (2011). Experiential ‘hot’ knowledge and its influence on low-SES students’ capacities to aspire to higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 52(2), 165–177.

Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.

Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory, London: Blackwell Publishers.

Willans, J. (2019). Tales from the borderland: Enabling students’ experiences of preparation for higher education. International Studies in Widening Participation, 6(1), 48–64.

Whannell, R. (2013). Predictors of Attrition and Achievement in a Tertiary Bridging Program. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 53(2), 280–301.

Whannell, R. & Whannell, P. (2015). Identity theory as a theoretical framework to understand attrition for university students in transition. Student Success, 6(2), 43–52.

Zepke, N. (2017). Learning with peers, active citizenship and student engagement in enabling education. Keynote presented at National Association of Enabling Educators of Australia (NAEEA) Conference 2017, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast Campus.

Zepke, N. & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167–177.