Is it simple to be parents in philosophy? A kitchen table dialogue

Main Article Content

Eva-Maria Aigner
Jonas Oßwald

Abstract

Tillie Olsen (1978) drew attention to an evident, yet underappreciated fact of writing, which is that it takes time: ‘Where the claims of creation cannot be primary, the results are atrophy; unfinished work; minor effort and accomplishment; silences’ (p. 13). Drawing from our experiences as a precariously employed PhD student and a postdoc in philosophy with parenting responsibilities, we want to address this type of silencing in a manner that stylistically corresponds to the exhaustion, lack of time, and lack of leisure experienced by many caregivers in academia. For this, we want to record one of the few occasions in our daily routine where there is sufficient time and mental capacity to reflect on our own situation: the conversation at the kitchen table in the evening when the chores are done. Our contribution consists in a redacted transcription of this conversation for which we propose the term ‘autotheoretical dialogue’ (see Fournier 2021; Young 1997). Our dialogue covers topics such as: care in relation to class and gender (Lightman & Link 2021); teaching in higher education as a form of care work in contrast to the more prestigious work of research (Cardozo 2017); the precarious working conditions in academia and their relation to parenting (Spina et al. 2022); the ignorance and hostility towards parenthood in academia; the effects of this marginalisation like fatigue, self-doubt, and depression, but also the ambivalence that arises from the conflict of the joy of caring; and the institutional and cultural difficulties of reconciling academic work with parenthood.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aigner, E.-M., & Oßwald, J. (2024). Is it simple to be parents in philosophy? A kitchen table dialogue. Access: Critical Explorations of Equity in Higher Education, 12(1), 61–77. Retrieved from https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/ceehe/index.php/iswp/article/view/220
Section
Article
Author Biography

Eva-Maria Aigner, University of Vienna

Tillie Olsen (1978) drew attention to an evident, yet underappreciated fact of writing, which is that it takes time: ‘Where the claims of creation cannot be primary, the results are atrophy; unfinished work; minor effort and accomplishment; silences’ (p. 13). Drawing from our experiences as a precariously employed PhD student and a postdoc in philosophy with parenting responsibilities, we want to address this type of silencing in a manner that stylistically corresponds to the exhaustion, lack of time, and lack of leisure experienced by many caregivers in academia. For this, we want to record one of the few occasions in our daily routine where there is sufficient time and mental capacity to reflect on our own situation: the conversation at the kitchen table in the evening when the chores are done. Our contribution consists in a redacted transcription of this conversation for which we propose the term ‘autotheoretical dialogue’ (see Fournier 2021; Young 1997). Our dialogue covers topics such as: care in relation to class and gender (Lightman & Link 2021); teaching in higher education as a form of care work in contrast to the more prestigious work of research (Cardozo 2017); the precarious working conditions in academia and their relation to parenting (Spina et al. 2022); the ignorance and hostility towards parenthood in academia; the effects of this marginalisation like fatigue, self-doubt, and depression, but also the ambivalence that arises from the conflict of the joy of caring; and the institutional and cultural difficulties of reconciling academic work with parenthood.

References

Arruzza, C, Bhattacharya, T, & Fraser, N 2019, Feminism for the 99%: A manifesto, Verso, London/New York.

Cardozo, K 2017, ‘Academic labor: Who cares?’, Critical Sociology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 405-428, doi: 10.1177/0896920516641733

Cox, N & Federici, S 1975, Counter-planning from the kitchen, Falling Wall Press, New York.

Cusk, R 2001, A life’s work: On becoming a mother, Picador, New York.

DFG 2022, ‘Information relating to special personal circumstances’, viewed 10 June 2024, www.dfg.de/en/research-funding/proposal-funding-process/faq/faq-personal-circumstances

Faderman, L 1981, Surpassing the love of men: Romantic friendship and love between women from the renaissance to the present, Quill, New York.

Federici, S 2016, ‘“We have seen other countries and have another culture”: Migrant domestic workers and the international production and circulation of feminist knowledge and organization’, Journal of Labor & Society, vol. 19, pp. 9–23, doi: 10.1111/wusa.12224

Fournier, L 2021, Autotheory as feminist practice in art, writing, and criticism, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Gac-Artigas, P 2009, ‘La cocina: de cerrado espacio de servidumbre a Abierto espacio de creación’ [‘The kitchen: the closed space of bondage to open creation space’], Revista de Curiosidad Cultural [Magazine of Cultural Curiosity], vol. 3, no.19, pp. 512–522

GBD 2021 Fertility and Forecasting Collaborators 2024, ‘Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: A comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021’, The Lancet, vol. 403, no. 10440, pp.2057–99, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00550-6

Hinojosa, M 1995, ‘Foreword’, in B Milligan, M Milligan, M Guerrero-Milligan & A de Hoyos (eds.), Daughters of the Fifth Sun, Riverhead Books, New York, pp. 13-19.

Jaquet, C 2014, Les transclasses ou la non-reproduction [The transclasses or the non-reproduction], Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

Lévi-Strauss, C 1961, Tristes tropiques [Sad tropics], Criterion, New York.

Lightman, N & Link, C 2021, ‘Gender, class and the cost of unpaid care: An analysis of 25 countries’, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 206–244, doi: 10.3138/jcfs-52-2-004

Marx, K 1969‚ Die deutsche Ideologie [The German ideology]‘, in K Marx & F Engels (eds.) Marx-Engels-Werke 3, Dietz, Berlin/DDR.

Olsen, T 1978, Silences, Dell, New York.

Oßwald, J 2024, ‘Normalize and control: Philosophy in neoliberalism’, Pli: Warwick Journal of Philosophy, vol. 35, pp. 17–45.

Schütte-Lihotzky, M 1927, ‘Rationalisierung im Haushalt’ [Rationalisation in the household], Das Neue Frankfurt [The New Frankfurt], vol. 5, pp.120–123.

Spina, N, Smithers, K, Harris, J, & Mewburn, I 2022, ‘Back to zero? Precarious employment in academia amongst ‘older’ early career researchers, a life-course approach’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol 43, no. 4, pp. 534–549, doi: 10.1080/01425692.2022.2057925.

Steger, K 2014, Hättest halt kein Kind gekriegt! [If you just hadn’t had children!], Orac, Vienna.

Wallraven, M 2007, A writing halfway between theory and fiction: Mediating feminism from the seventeenth to the twentieth century, Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg.

Young, S 1997, Changing the wor(l)d: Discourse, politics and the feminist movement, Routledge, London/New York.