Living the best way possible: Distance doctoral students navigating care for others and themselves

Main Article Content

Katrina McChesney
James Burford
Liezel Frick

Abstract

Caring responsibilities can shape how students negotiate access, experience and success in doctoral education. However, norms that construct the ideal university subject as ‘carefree’ continue to circulate, framing the experiences and expectations of doctoral students, their supervisors, and others who work with them. This paper shares care-related insights from an international survey involving 521 doctoral students across 42 countries who undertook their studies wholly or partly off-campus. Over half of these respondents had caring responsibilities for others, underlining the importance of distance modes for student carers. Many carer respondents felt distance modes offered the best way possible to organise life, education, and caring responsibilities. Care for self was also an important thread throughout the data, encompassing students managing specific physical or mental health needs as well as being proactive in caring for themselves through the challenges of doctoral education. Finally, in terms of care that respondents received rather than provided, peer connections with other doctoral students were emphasised as critical sites of care that enabled wellbeing and success. Given that both off-campus students and student carers have often been rendered less visible in higher and doctoral education, this paper brings new insights into the important nexus between distance study and care – in multiple forms – for doctoral students.

Article Details

How to Cite
McChesney, K., Burford, J., & Frick, L. (2024). Living the best way possible: Distance doctoral students navigating care for others and themselves. Access: Critical Explorations of Equity in Higher Education, 12(1), 106–125. Retrieved from https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/ceehe/index.php/iswp/article/view/223
Section
Article

References

Abdellatif, A & Gatto, M 2020, ‘It’s OK not to be OK: Shared reflections from two PhD parents in a time of pandemic’, Gender, Work & Organization, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 723-733, doi: 10.1111/gwao.12465

Aitchison, C & Mowbray, S 2013, ‘Doctoral women: Managing emotions, managing doctoral studies’, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 859–870, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827642

Anderson, B & Simpson, M 2012, ‘History and heritage in open, flexible and distance education’, Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1-10, viewed 28 September 2024, www.learntechlib.org/p/147885/

Baker, S & Burke, R 2023, Questioning care in higher education: Resisting definitions as radical, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Barnacle, R 2018, ‘Research education and care: The care-full PhD’ in S Bengtsen & R Barnett (eds), The thinking university: A philosophical examination of thought and higher education, Debating higher education: Philosophical perspectives series, Springer, Berlin, pp. 77-86.

Bates, PJ & Goff, L 2012, ‘The invisible student: Benefits and challenges of part-time doctoral studies’, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 368-380, doi: 10.55016/ojs/ajer.v58i3.55628

Beck, U & Beck-Gernshein, E 2001, Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences, SAGE, London.

Burford, J & Hook, G 2019, Curating care-full spaces: Doctoral students negotiating study from home, Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1343-1355, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1657805

Burford, J, McChesney, K, Frick, L & Khoo, T 2024, ‘Conceptualising distance doctoral study after COVID-19: Are we post-distance now?’, Distance Education, pp. 1-18, doi: 10.1080/01587919.2024.2388216

Burford, J & Mitchell, C 2022, ‘Doctoral carers: Tracing contradictory discourses and identifying possibilities for a more care-full doctoral education’, in G Hook et al. (eds.), Student carers in higher education: Navigating, resisting, and re-inventing academic cultures, Routledge, London, pp. 121-137.

Carter, S, Smith, K & Harrison, N 2021, ‘Working in the borderlands: Critical perspectives on doctoral education’, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 283-292, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2021.1911098

Cronshaw, S, Stokes, P & McCulloch, A 2023, ‘Outside looking in: Gendered roles and the wellbeing of working student mothers studying for a part-time PhD’, Higher Education Quarterly, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 608-624, doi: 10.1111/hequ.12471

Crossouard, B 2008, ‘Developing alternative models of doctoral supervision with online formative assessment’, Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 51-67, doi: 10.1080/01580370701841549

Deem, R 2022, ‘On doctoral (in)visibility and reframing the doctorate for the twenty-first century’, European Journal of Higher Education, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 373-392, doi: 10.1080/21568235.2022.2105370

Dodo-Balu, A 2018, ‘Fairness and inclusion: Online learning as an enabler of Australian higher education policies aimed at student equity and social justice’, International Studies in Widening Participation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 26-39, viewed 28 September 2024, https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/ceehe/index.php/iswp/article/view/103

Dutta, S, Roy, A & Ghosh, S 2022, ‘An observational study to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the factors affecting the mental well-being of doctoral students’, Trends in Psychology, doi: 10.1007/s43076-022-00211-5

Evans, T & Green, R 2012, ‘Doctorates for professionals through distance education’, in MG Moore (ed.), Handbook of distance education, 3rd edn, Routledge, London, pp. 654-669.

Evans, T, Hickey, C & Davis, H 2004, ‘Research issues arising from doctoral education at a distance’, in T Evans, P Smith & E Stacey (eds.), RIDE 2004: Research in Distance Education 6: Selected refereed papers from the 2004 Research in Distance Education conference, pp. 120-131.

Faith, K 1998, Toward new horizons for women in distance education: International perspectives, Routledge, London.

Fisher, B & Tronto, JC 1991, ‘Toward a feminist theory of care’, in EK Abel & MK Nelson (eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives, State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 35-62.

Goldin, C 2021, Career and family: Women’s century-long journey toward equity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Grant, BM, Sato, M & Skelling, J 2022, ‘“Life is based on reciprocity, so be generous”: Ethical work in doctoral acknowledgements’, Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 315-330, doi: 10.1108/SGPE-12-2021-0082.

Halse, C & Bansel, P 2012, ‘The learning alliance: Ethics in doctoral supervision’, Oxford Review of Education, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 377-392, doi: 10.1080/03054985.2012.706219

Hook, G 2016, Sole parent students and higher education: Gender, policy and widening participation, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Hook, G, Moreau, M-P & Brooks, R 2022, ‘Introduction’, in G Hook, M-P Moreau & R Brooks (eds.), Student carers in higher education: Navigating, resisting, and re-inventing academic cultures, Routledge, London, pp. 1-9.

It’s hard being a carer and a PhD student. My university couldn’t care less 2016, viewed 28 September 2024, www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2016/sep/30/its-hard-being-a-carer-and-a-phd-student-my-university-couldnt-care-less

Leonard, D 2001, A woman’s guide to doctoral studies, Open University Press, Buckingham.

Lindner, JR, Dooley, KE & Murphy, TH 2001, ‘Differences in competencies between doctoral students on‐campus and at a distance’, American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 25-40, doi: 10.1080/08923640109527082

Löfström, E, Tikkanen, L, Anttila, H & Pyhältö, K 2024, ‘Supervisors’ experiences of doctoral supervision in times of change’, Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 34-48, doi: 10.1108/SGPE-01-2023-0004

Lynch, RJ, Perry, B, Googe, C, Krachenfels, J, McCloud, K, Spencer-Tyree, B, Oliver, R & Morgan, K 2020, ‘My wellness is: An art-based collective autoethnographic illustration of doctoral student wellness in online distance education environments’, Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 73-88, doi: 10.1108/SGPE-05-2019-0049

Markides, J 2020, ‘Driving: The unseen responsibilities of a doctoral student, mother, and more’, in SE Eaton & A Burns (eds.), Women negotiating life in the academy, Springer, New York, pp. 131-145.

Mason, S, Bond, M & Ledger, S 2023, ‘How motherhood enhances and strains doctoral research/ers’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1087-1105, doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2023.2218274

McChesney, K & Burford, J in press, ‘Distance higher education’, in M-P Moreau (ed.), Encyclopedia of social justice in education (Gender and sexuality volume), Bloomsbury, London.

McChesney, K, Burford, J, Frick, L & Khoo, L 2024, Doing doctoral research at a distance: Flourishing in off-campus, hybrid, and remote pathways, Routledge, London.

Mirick, RG & Wladkowski, SP 2018, ‘Pregnancy, motherhood, and academic career goals: Doctoral students’ perspectives’, Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 253-269, doi: 10.1177/0886109917753835

Moreau, M-P & Kerner, C 2015, ‘Care in academia: An exploration of student parents’ experiences’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 215–233 doi: 10.1080/01425692.2013.814533

Moreau, M-P & Wheeler, L 2023, ‘Through a glass, darkly: Gazing into the field of carers in academia’, Review of Education, vol. 11, no. 1, e3387, doi: 10.1002/rev3.3387

Nasiri, F & Mafakheri, F 2015, ‘Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies’, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1962-1969, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.914906

Noddings, N 2012, ‘The caring relation in teaching’, Oxford Review of Education, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 771-781, doi: 10.1080/03054985.2012.745047

Perepiczka, M & Balkin, RS 2010, ‘Relationship between wellness and age, matriculation, and relationship status of counselor education doctoral students’, Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, vol. 49, pp. 203-216, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-1939.2010.tb00098.x

Saldaña, J 2021, The coding manual for qualitative researchers SAGE, London.

Shah, M, Goode, E, West, S & Clark, H 2014, ‘Widening student participation in higher education through online enabling education’ Widening Participation and Online Learning, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 36-57, doi: 10.5456/WPLL.16.3.36

Spacey, R, Sanderson, R & Zile, A 2024, ‘The care-less academy? Making space for parents and carers in higher education’, Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 7-33, doi: 10.5456/WPLL.26.1.7

Stalnaker-Shofner, D, Lounsbury, C, Collagan, S, Keck, S & Roberts, R 2021, ‘Perceived stress and self-care in graduate students amidst the COVID-19 pandemic’, Journal of Wellness, vol. 3, no. 2, doi: 10.55504/2578-9333.1059

Stone, C, Dowling, J & Dyment, J 2021, ‘Improving student retention and success within the context of complex lives and diverse circumstances’, in T Fawns, G Aitken & D Jones (eds.), Online postgraduate education in a postdigital world, Postdigital science and education series, Springer, Berlin, pp. 161-178.

Stone, C, Freeman, E, Dyment, JE, Muir, T & Milthorpe, N 2019, ‘Equal or equitable? The role of flexibility within online education’, Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 26-40, doi: 10.47381/aijre.v29i2.221

Stone, C & O’Shea, S 2019, ‘“My children ... think it’s cool that Mum is a uni student”: Women with caring responsibilities studying online’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 97-110, doi: 10.14742/ajet.5504

Sumner, J 2000, ‘Serving the system: A critical history of distance education’ Open Learning, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 267-285, doi: 10.1080/713688409

Tronto, J 1994, Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care, Routledge, London.

Winston, BE & Fields, DL 2003, ‘Developing dissertation skills of doctoral students in an internet-based distance education curriculum: A case study’, American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 161-172, doi: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1703_3

Wisker, G, McGinn, MK, Bengtsen, SSE, Lokhtina, I, He, F, Cornér, S, Leshem, S, Inouye, K & Löfström, E 2021, ‘Remote doctoral supervision experiences: Challenges and affordances’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 612-623, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2021.1991427