Design for success: Did we get it right? Measuring the success of STEPS as a remodelled CQUniversity enabling offering

Main Article Content

Karen Seary
Julie Willans
Chris Cook

Abstract

As a consequence of a 2011 external review of enabling offerings at CQUniversity Australia, the well-established Skills for Tertiary Education Preparatory Studies (STEPS) program (CZ01) underwent a significant remodel. Several recommendations of the review were adopted and the seven existing enabling program offerings were collapsed into a single enabling program which incorporated the best aspects of each of the prior offerings. The single enabling program model retained the name STEPS and was premised on the need to build greater flexibility into the offering as an acknowledgement of the conflicting demands that pose as challenges to students’ time. A curriculum refresh saw the STEPS program adopt one core course supported by a suite of eleven electives from which students can draw in accordance with the requirements of the undergraduate degree programs to which they will articulate. The desire for improved retention drove the establishment of the Access Coordinator role to manage the program on each campus and provide pastoral care to participating students, particularly those at risk of withdrawing from the program. The new model provides a more tailored preparation through the adoption of online diagnostic testing to ascertain student readiness, and the establishment of an individualised Required Study Plan for all students. This is based on the students’ career aspirations and the predetermined requirements of their chosen undergraduate program. Three years on, this paper captures the student voice as an indicator of the success of the new model.

Article Details

How to Cite
Seary, K., Willans, J., & Cook, C. (2016). Design for success: Did we get it right? Measuring the success of STEPS as a remodelled CQUniversity enabling offering. Access: Critical Explorations of Equity in Higher Education, 3(1), 4–18. Retrieved from https://novaojs.newcastle.edu.au/ceehe/index.php/iswp/article/view/41
Section
Research Paper

References

CQUniversity Australia. (2016a). About us, accessed 11/04/16 at https://www.cqu.edu.au/about-us

CQUniversity Australia. (2016b). University History, accessed 12/04/16 at https://www.cqu.edu.au/about-us/history

Darab, S. (2003). Women happy with their timetables. Refereed paper published TASA conference, University of Armidale, 13–15 December.

Darab, S. (2004). Time and study. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 44(3), 325-353.

Devlin, M., Kift, S., Nelson, K., Smith, L & McKay, J. (2012). Effective teaching and support of students from low socioeconomic status backgrounds: Resources for Australian higher education, Final Report 2012, accessed 03/02/16 at http://www.lowses.edu.au/assets/ALTC%20LSES%20Final%20Report%202012.pdf

Doyle, S. (2006). Central Queensland University STEPS – Celebrating 20 Years 1986 – 2006. Central Queensland University, Queensland.

Foley, G. (2000). Understanding adult education and training (2nd Ed.). NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Foley, G. (Ed.). (2004). Dimensions of Adult Learning – Adult education and training in a global era, Allen & Unwin, Australia.

Jarvis, P. (2012). Adult Learning in the social context. Routledge, New York.

King, B. (2011). Bridging programs and academic student support – a review, Rockhampton: CQUniversity.

King, S., Luzeckyj, A., McCann, B. & Graham C. (2015). Exploring the experience of being first in family at university – A 2014 Student equity in higher education research grants project, National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education, accessed 03/02/16 at https://www.ncsehe.edu.au/publications/exploring-the-experience-of-being-first-in-family-at-university/

Knowles, M., Elwood, F. & Swanson, R. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development, Eighth Edition, Routledge, New York.

Mann, C. & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet Communications and Qualitative research: A handbook for researching online, Sage Publications, London.

Meho, L. (2006). E-Mail interviewing in qualitative research: a methodological discussion, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1284-1295.

Murray, C & Sixsmith, J. (1998). E-mail: a qualitative research medium for interviewing? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(2), 103-121, DOI: 10.1080/13645579.1998.10846867

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods, Edition 3.CAL: Sage Publications, Inc.

Richie, J. & Spencer, L. (2002). Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In Analyzing Qualitative Data, edited by Alan Bryman and Robert G. Burgess (pp. 173-194), Taylor and Francis Books Ltd.

Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-461). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.

Willans, J. (2010). Navigating personal change: Transforming perceptions of self as learner. Doctoral thesis, Rockhampton: CQUniversity.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.